<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.genomebiology.com/feeds/articlecomments?arxId=gb-2007-8-6-r99&amp;format=rss&amp;version=&amp;quantity=">
        <title>Article Comments - 'Did an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis facilitate the establishment of primary plastids?'</title>
        <link>http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/6/R99/comments</link>
        <description>The latest comments on the article 'Did an ancient chlamydial endosymbiosis facilitate the establishment of primary plastids?'</description>
        <dc:date>2008-06-23T14:50:42Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li resource="http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/6/R99" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/6/R99/comments#305564">
        <title>Why present-day Plantae have no chlamydial symbionts?</title>
        <link>http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/6/R99/comments#305564</link>
        <description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent article. I very much enjoyed the detailed discussion of alternative hypotheses and phylogenies. I didn&apos;t know about the chlamydial role on plastid origin until I read a recent article confirming and expanding the results presented here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Moustafa A, Reyes-Prieto A, Bhattacharya D (2008) &lt;a href=&apos;http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002205&apos;&gt;Chlamydiae Has Contributed at Least 55 Genes to Plantae with Predominantly Plastid Functions.&lt;/a&gt; PLoS ONE 3(5): e2205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002205&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the PLoS ONE site I have posted a comment/question (that of the title of the present comment), in case anybody can contribute to the discussion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <dc:creator>Cesar Sanchez</dc:creator>
                <dc:date>2008-06-23T14:50:42Z</dc:date>
        <prism:references>http://genomebiology.com/2007/8/6/R99</prism:references>
        <prism:person>Huang et al.</prism:person>
        <prism:publicationName>Genome Biology</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>R99</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>Mon Jun 04 00:00:00 BST 2007</prism:publicationDate>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

