<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
	<ui>gb-2005-6-12-r101</ui>
	<ji>GBJ</ji>
	<fm>
		<dochead>Research</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>Gene expression and metabolite profiling of <it>Populus euphratica </it>growing in the Negev desert</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1">
					<snm>Brosch&#233;</snm>
					<fnm>Mikael</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>Mikael.brosche@helsinki.fi</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A2">
					<snm>Vinocur</snm>
					<fnm>Basia</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A3">
					<snm>Alatalo</snm>
					<mi>R</mi>
					<fnm>Edward</fnm>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A4">
					<snm>Lamminm&#228;ki</snm>
					<fnm>Airi</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A5">
					<snm>Teichmann</snm>
					<fnm>Thomas</fnm>
					<insr iid="I4"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A6">
					<snm>Ottow</snm>
					<mi>A</mi>
					<fnm>Eric</fnm>
					<insr iid="I4"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A7">
					<snm>Djilianov</snm>
					<fnm>Dimitar</fnm>
					<insr iid="I5"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A8">
					<snm>Afif</snm>
					<fnm>Dany</fnm>
					<insr iid="I6"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A9">
					<snm>Bogeat-Triboulot</snm>
					<fnm>Marie-B&#233;atrice</fnm>
					<insr iid="I7"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A10">
					<snm>Altman</snm>
					<fnm>Arie</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A11">
					<snm>Polle</snm>
					<fnm>Andrea</fnm>
					<insr iid="I4"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A12">
					<snm>Dreyer</snm>
					<fnm>Erwin</fnm>
					<insr iid="I7"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A13">
					<snm>Rudd</snm>
					<fnm>Stephen</fnm>
					<insr iid="I8"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A14">
					<snm>Paulin</snm>
					<fnm>Lars</fnm>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A15">
					<snm>Auvinen</snm>
					<fnm>Petri</fnm>
					<insr iid="I3"/>
				</au>
				<au id="A16" ca="yes">
					<snm>Kangasj&#228;rvi</snm>
					<fnm>Jaakko</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>jaakko.kangasjarvi@helsinki.fi</email>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Plant Biology, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 65, Viikinkaari 1, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I2">
					<p>The Robert H Smith Institute of Plant Sciences and Genetics in Agriculture, Faculty of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Quality Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Herzl Street, Rehovot 76100, Israel</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I3">
					<p>Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, Viikinkaari 4, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I4">
					<p>Institut f&#252;r Forstbotanik, Georg-August-Universit&#228;t G&#246;ttingen, B&#252;sgenweg 2, 37077 G&#246;ttingen, Germany</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I5">
					<p>AgroBioInstitute, 8 Dragan Tzankov Boulevard, 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I6">
					<p>UMR INRA-UHP Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Foresti&#232;res, Facult&#233; des Sciences, F-54506 Vandoeuvre, France</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I7">
					<p>UMR INRA-UHP Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Foresti&#232;res, IFR 110 G&#233;nomique, Ecophysiologie et Ecologie Fonctionnelle, INRA Nancy, Route d'Amance, F-54280 Champenoux, France</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I8">
					<p>Turku Centre for Biotechnology, BioCity, Tykist&#246;katu 6, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Genome Biology</source>
			<issn>1465-6906</issn>
			<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
			<volume>6</volume>
			<issue>12</issue>
			<fpage>R101</fpage>
			<url>http://genomebiology.com/2005/6/12/R101</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmpid">16356264</pubid><pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-2005-6-12-r101</pubid>
				</pubidlist></xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>27</day>
					<month>5</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<revrec>
				<date>
					<day>22</day>
					<month>7</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</revrec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>2</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>2</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2005</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2005</year>
			<collab>Brosch&#233; et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
			<note>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
		</cpyrt>
		<shorttitle>
			<p>Expression profiling desert-grown trees</p>
		</shorttitle>
		<shortabs>
			<p>A <it>Populus euphratica </it>DNA microarray was constructed and used to analyze gene expression in trees growing in the desert. <it>P. euphratica </it>is shown to express a set of genes that is different from other <it>Populus </it>trees and these genes contribute to adaptation to saline growth conditions.</p>
		</shortabs>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Background</p>
					</st>
					<p>Plants growing in their natural habitat represent a valuable resource for elucidating mechanisms of acclimation to environmental constraints. <it>Populus euphratica </it>is a salt-tolerant tree species growing in saline semi-arid areas. To identify genes involved in abiotic stress responses under natural conditions we constructed several normalized and subtracted cDNA libraries from control, stress-exposed and desert-grown <it>P. euphratica </it>trees. In addition, we identified several metabolites in desert-grown <it>P. euphratica </it>trees.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Results</p>
					</st>
					<p>About 14,000 expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences were obtained with a good representation of genes putatively involved in resistance and tolerance to salt and other abiotic stresses. A <it>P. euphratica </it>DNA microarray with a uni-gene set of ESTs representing approximately 6,340 different genes was constructed. The microarray was used to study gene expression in adult <it>P. euphratica </it>trees growing in the desert canyon of Ein Avdat in Israel. In parallel, 22 selected metabolites were profiled in the same trees.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Conclusion</p>
					</st>
					<p>Of the obtained ESTs, 98% were found in the sequenced <it>P. trichocarpa </it>genome and 74% in other <it>Populus </it>EST collections. This implies that the <it>P. euphratica </it>genome does not contain different genes <it>per se</it>, but that regulation of gene expression might be different and that <it>P. euphratica </it>expresses a different set of genes that contribute to adaptation to saline growth conditions. Also, all of the five measured amino acids show increased levels in trees growing in the more saline soil.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
	<meta>
		<classifications>
			<classification type="BMC" subtype="man_spc_id" id="30010019">Plant biology</classification>
			<classification type="BMC" subtype="man_spc_id" id="30010010">Genome studies</classification>
		</classifications>
	</meta>
	<bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st>
			<p>Most studies on biotic and abiotic stress in plants are performed under controlled laboratory and/or greenhouse environments. The advantage of this approach is that the influence of a single or a few factors affecting the plant can be studied separately in great detail. The disadvantage is that a plant growing in its natural habitat is unlikely to experience only a single stress factor. Furthermore, short term laboratory experiments may not allow plants to acclimate to the imposed constraints as happens during moderate and long lasting constraints in natural habitats. Thus, knowledge obtained from controlled experiments may not be directly applicable to field conditions. The importance of adaptation and acclimation is even more crucial in trees that have a life span of several decades or longer and thus will be exposed to repeated episodes of abiotic and biotic stresses.</p>
			<p>Over the past decade, several species in the genus <it>Populus </it>have emerged as model woody plants. The genus <it>Populus </it>includes a wide variety of species (about 30) from different areas around the world displaying a range of different growth characteristics and tolerance towards various stress conditions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B1">1</abbr></abbrgrp>. Extensive genetic resources, including expressed sequence tag (EST) collections in several <it>Populus </it>species, their relatively small genome (approximately 520 Mbp) and rapid early growth, and the complete sequencing of the whole genome of <it>Populus trichocarpa </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B2">2</abbr></abbrgrp> make it possible to perform molecular research in several <it>Populus </it>species with an array of tools that are still not available for any other tree species.</p>
			<p><it>Populus euphratica </it>Oliv. is considered to be salt tolerant when compared to other <it>Populus </it>species <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B3">3</abbr></abbrgrp>. Salinity is a major abiotic stress acting primarily as an osmotic stress and causes the disruption of homeostasis and ion distribution in the cell. In addition, it causes oxidative stress, damage to membranes and proteins, and activates signaling cascades leading to changes in gene expression <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B4">4</abbr><abbr bid="B5">5</abbr></abbrgrp>. <it>P. euphratica </it>has a natural distribution extending over semi-arid areas in the Middle East and Asia. It grows at locations with a wide variety of temperature and soil conditions, such as high temperatures in the air and high salt content in the soil. <it>In vitro </it>experiments have indicated that <it>P. euphratica </it>can tolerate up to 450 mM NaCl <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			<p>Deserts represent one of the harshest ecosystems on earth, combining low precipitation and extreme temperatures, and sometimes also elevated salt levels. Molecular mechanisms of adaptation to desert conditions have previously been studied in the desert legume <it>Retama raetam </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr><abbr bid="B8">8</abbr></abbrgrp>. <it>R. raetam </it>uses a strategy where the upper, light exposed parts of the plants enter dormancy and protect the lower part of the plant by giving shade <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B7">7</abbr></abbrgrp>. Although <it>P. euphratica </it>trees do grow in saline arid desert areas, it does not show physiologically significant drought stress, suggesting access to water <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr></abbrgrp>, and is actually highly sensitive to hydraulic dysfunctions in the xylem <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B10">10</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, the strategies used by <it>P. euphratica </it>to grow under desert conditions are likely to be different from those used by <it>R. raetam</it>, probably relying on access to deep water tables.</p>
			<p>Here we describe sequencing of ESTs from <it>P. euphratica </it>growing in the Ein Avdat canyon in the Negev desert in Israel <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B11">11</abbr></abbrgrp>. This collection is expected to contain important ESTs for physiological acclimation and adaptation to 'desert' conditions, for example, high temperature, salinity and drought. Although several EST collections are available from multiple tissues in <it>Populus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B12">12</abbr><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B14">14</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr><abbr bid="B16">16</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B18">18</abbr><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>, almost all these collections were produced from plants growing under close to optimal environmental conditions. Thus, ESTs representing genes responsive to abiotic stress, in particular salt and drought, are likely to be under-represented in them. To obtain a more complete collection of the <it>Populus </it>abiotic stress-related transcriptome, we sequenced ESTs from normalized <it>P. euphratica </it>cDNA libraries, and subtracted cDNA libraries prepared from multiple abiotic stress treatments, including salt, drought, ozone, cold, freezing and flooding. A <it>P. euphratica </it>DNA microarray containing 8,153 ESTs representing 6,340 different genes was constructed and used to analyze gene expression in leaf samples from the desert valley Ein Avdat in Israel. In addition, we also performed metabolite profiling on Ein Avdat leaf samples.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Results</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Normalized and subtracted cDNA library construction</p>
				</st>
				<p>To capture as many as possible of the genes regulated by abiotic stress in <it>P. euphratica</it>, 17 different normalized and subtracted cDNA libraries were prepared from control and stress exposed trees. The treatments included several physiologically relevant abiotic stresses; salt, cold, drought, flooding and ozone (Additional data file 1). In addition, as a first step to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind adaptation of <it>P. euphratica </it>to desert conditions, trees growing in the Ein Avdat valley were used for library construction (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). In total, 13,838 ESTs were obtained from the 17 libraries, with an average length of 478 nucleotides. The subtraction efficiency was estimated by 'electronic northern' analysis, that is, counting the abundance of various ESTs in different libraries (Additional data files 2 and 3). In the subtracted libraries prepared from leaves, all abundant photosynthesis genes were significantly removed (Additional data file 2) and in the subtracted libraries prepared from root tissues, genes with a putative role in abiotic stress were significantly enriched (Additional data file 3). The ESTs were submitted to GenBank with the accession numbers <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ767069">AJ767069</ext-link> to <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ780913">AJ780913</ext-link>.</p>
				<fig id="F1">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Ein Avdat areas A, B, C and P</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Ein Avdat areas A, B, C and P. <b>(a) </b>Area A trees grow near water and have a wide trunk and a large crown. <b>(b) </b>Trees from area B have narrower trunks than trees from area A. <b>(c) </b>Trees growing in area C on the slope, further from the water spring, have a narrow trunk and a small crown and display symptoms of being stressed. <b>(d) </b>Trees in area P, located 1 km from the Ein Avdat canyon, were planted in 1989 and originate from root suckers of trees growing in the valley. The trees at area P are irrigated once a week.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2005-6-12-r101-1" hint_layout="single"/>
				</fig>
				<p>The 13,838 ESTs were analyzed and annotated within an openSputnik EST database as previously described <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>. Clustering and assembly of the EST sequences yielded 7,841 unigene features. These unigenes were exhaustively annotated for features including, but not restricted to, probable peptide sequence, Uniprot <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B21">21</abbr></abbrgrp> matches, sequence overlap with complete and incomplete plant genome collections, and Gene Ontology assignments <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>. The entire database, including all annotative attributes and complete electronic northern analysis for all 17 EST libraries, can be viewed at the openSputnik website <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Comparison to other plant genome and EST collections</p>
				</st>
				<p>The <it>P. euphratica </it>EST sequence collection was compared to sequences taxonomically oriented to the rest of the plant kingdom. The <it>P. euphratica </it>unigenes were anchored using BLAST methods to derive plant sequence datasets using an arbitrary expectation value of 1e-10. The datasets were constructed to represent both completed genomes (<it>P. trichocarpa</it>, <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it>and <it>Oryza sativa</it>) and openSputnik unigene collections from clades of taxonomically related sequences. The numbers of sequences that could be matched to a sequence collection are shown in Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr>. The <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection was highly similar to the <it>P. trichocarpa </it>genome assembly <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B24">24</abbr></abbrgrp>; 97.6% of the ESTs can be found in the genome. Currently, approximately 250,000 ESTs from other <it>Populus </it>species are available from GenBank (Additional data file 4, dbEST release 062405). The <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection overlaps these ESTs by 74%, which leaves approximately 2,000 novel ESTs in the present <it>P. euphratica </it>collection, indicating that the strategy of using normalized and subtracted stress enriched libraries has been successful at identifying novel <it>Populus </it>ESTs. Furthermore, the overlap of ESTs between <it>P. euphratica </it>and <it>P. tremuloides</it>, <it>P. trichocarpa</it>, <it>P. tremula </it>&#215; <it>P. tremuloides</it>, <it>P. euramericana</it>, <it>P. alba </it>&#215; <it>P. tremula</it>, <it>P. trichocarpa </it>&#215; <it>P. deltoides</it>, <it>P. nigra</it>, <it>P. tremula </it>and <it>P. deltoides </it>varied between 21% and 63% (Additional data file 4). The coding content of <it>Populus </it>and <it>Arabidopsis </it>genomes has previously been shown to be highly similar <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B19">19</abbr></abbrgrp>. Consistent with this, the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection also has a high overlap (69%) with the <it>Arabidopsis </it>genome. Interestingly, 763 sequences (approximately 10%) were only present in this <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection and in the <it>P. trichocarpa </it>genome and not in any other plant EST or genome collections. This further validates the use of normalized and stress subtracted libraries for identifying novel ESTs. A total of 54 sequences with significant length and coding potential are not present in any other sequence collections, and may thus represent <it>P. euphratica </it>specific genes.</p>
				<tbl id="T1" hint_layout="single">
					<title>
						<p>Table 1</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>unigene collection with other sequence collections from whole genomes or EST projects</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="4">
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Sequence collection</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Matches</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Unique</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="4">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>All</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c ca="right">
								<p>
									<b>7,841</b>
								</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="4">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>Populus </it>genome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>7,671</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>763</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>Arabidopsis </it>genome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5,434</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Rice genome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1,562</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>Populus </it>EST sequence</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5,780</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Rosid EST sequence</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4,597</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Asterid EST sequence</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>3,490</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Caryophyllid EST sequence</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2,081</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Monocot sequence</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2,135</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>3</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GenBank sequence</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5,495</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Short sequences</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>275</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>20</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Low protein coding potential</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>728</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>28</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>Remainder</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c ca="right">
								<p>
									<b>54</b>
								</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>All <it>P. euphratica </it>unigenes were compared against reference sequence collections to investigate sequence overlap and to identify the number of sequences unique to this sequence collection. The reference sequence collections include the draft <it>Populus </it>genome, the <it>Arabidopsis thaliana </it>genome, the rice genomes and pooled collections of openSputnik EST collections representing large collections from species taxonomically assigned to the plant groups of rosid, asterid, caryophyllid and monocot. Also included in the reference sets are the sequences having a match to an annotated protein in the UniProt database or <it>P. euphratica </it>sequences that are either short (less than 100 nucleotides) or have a low protein coding potential (less than 25% protein coding). In the table, the reference sequence collection is displayed along with the number of <it>P. euphratica </it>sequences that can be matches to the reference sequence collection and the number of sequences that are unique to this sequence collection. All blast analyses were performed using an arbitrary expectation value of 1e-10. The remainder (54) represents the number of sequences that have no match within any of the challenge datasets and may thus represent <it>P. euphratica </it>specific genes.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
				<p>To estimate the representation of stress related ESTs in the <it>P. euphratica </it>collection, a comparison was also made to other EST collections or DNA microarray experiments performed with stressed plants (<it>P. euphratica</it>, <it>P. trichocarpa </it>&#215; <it>P. deltoides</it>, <it>A. thaliana </it>and <it>Thellungiella halophila</it>) (Additional data file 5). Depending on the particular species or stress treatment, about 36% to 75% of known stress induced genes <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B27">27</abbr></abbrgrp> have an equivalent EST in the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection (Additional data file 5).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Functional annotation of the EST collection</p>
				</st>
				<p><it>P. euphratica </it>unigene sequences were functionally and structurally annotated using Gene Ontology <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B22">22</abbr></abbrgrp>, and the complete assignments are summarized in Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr> using the plant specific 'GOSlim' terms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp> under the three main categories of biological process, cellular component and molecular function. A broad range of functions and processes were represented in the <it>P. euphratica </it>ESTs. Annotation of the EST sequences with respect to GO terms for molecular function, biological process, and cellular component can be accessed at the openSputnik website <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<tbl id="T2" hint_layout="double">
					<title>
						<p>Table 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Gene Ontology annotation of <it>P. euphratica </it>unigene sequences</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="3">
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO term</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Number of sequences</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="3">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>biological_process</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0008150</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2,141</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>behavior</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007610</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>48</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cellular process</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009987</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>681</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cell communication</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007154</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>167</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cell-cell signaling</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007267</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>response to extracellular stimulus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009991</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>11</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>signal transduction</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007165</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>150</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cell death</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0008219</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>33</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cell differentiation</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0030154</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>87</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cell growth and/or maintenance</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0008151</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>546</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cell cycle</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007049</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>83</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cell growth</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0016049</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cell organization and biogenesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0016043</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>157</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cell homeostasis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0019725</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>25</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>transport</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006810</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>397</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>development</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007275</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>211</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cell differentiation</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0030154</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>87</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>embryonic development</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009790</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>flower development</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009908</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>12</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>morphogenesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009653</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>96</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>regulation of gene expression, epigenetic</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0040029</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>11</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>reproduction</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0000003</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>ripening</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009835</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>29</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>physiological process</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0007582</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2,096</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>photosynthesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0015979</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>74</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>response to stress</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006950</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>270</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>response to endogenous stimulus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009719</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>84</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>response to external stimulus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009605</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>229</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>response to abiotic stimulus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009628</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>69</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>response to biotic stimulus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009607</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>199</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0008152</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1,758</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>amino acid and derivative metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006519</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>123</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>biosynthesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009058</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>512</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>carbohydrate metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005975</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>255</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>catabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009056</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>317</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>electron transport</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006118</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>247</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>energy pathways</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006091</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>154</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>lipid metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006629</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>125</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>nucleobase\, nucleoside\, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006139</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>367</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>DNA metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006259</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>123</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>transcription</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006350</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>36</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>protein metabolism</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0019538</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>757</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>protein biosynthesis</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006412</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>252</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>protein modification</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0006464</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>222</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>cellular_component</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005575</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>33</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>cell</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005623</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>7</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>external encapsulating structure</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0030312</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cell wall</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005618</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>45</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>intracellular</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005622</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>234</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cytoplasm</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005737</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>386</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cytoskeleton</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005856</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>28</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>cytosol</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005829</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>101</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>endoplasmic reticulum</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005783</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>152</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>endosome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005768</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>15</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>Golgi apparatus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005794</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>lysosome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005764</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>36</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>mitochondrion</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005739</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>236</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>peroxisome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005777</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>39</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>plastid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009536</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>387</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>ribosome</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005840</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>173</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>vacuole</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005773</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>47</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>nucleus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005634</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>494</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>nuclear membrane</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005635</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>7</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>nucleolus</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005730</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>25</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>nucleoplasm</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005654</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>6</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>thylakoid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0009579</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>78</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>membrane</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0016020</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>436</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>plasma membrane</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005886</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>59</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>extracellular</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005576</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>15</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>extracellular matrix</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005578</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>6</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>extracellular space</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005615</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>8</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>unlocalized</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005941</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>11</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<b>molecular_function</b>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003674</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2,391</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>chaperone activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003754</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>78</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>catalytic activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003824</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1,424</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>hydrolase</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0016787</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>440</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>kinase</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0016301</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>199</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>transferase</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0016740</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>427</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>enzyme regulator activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0030234</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>38</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005488</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1,278</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>carbohydrate binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0030246</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>lipid binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0008289</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>22</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>nucleic acid binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003676</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>540</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>DNA binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003677</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>245</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>chromatin binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003682</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>8</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>transcription factor activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003700</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>63</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>nuclease activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0004518</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>20</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>RNA binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003723</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>216</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="2" ca="left">
								<p>translation factor activity, nucleic acid binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0008135</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>58</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>nucleotide binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0000166</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>482</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>oxygen binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0019825</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>protein binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005515</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>220</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>molecular_function unknown</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005554</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>84</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>motor activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0003774</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>17</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>signal transducer activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0004871</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>101</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>receptor binding</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005102</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>receptor activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0004872</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>61</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>structural molecule activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005198</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>232</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>transcription regulator activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0030528</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>102</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>translation regulator activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0045182</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>58</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>transporter activity</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GO:0005215</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>332</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p><it>P. euphratica </it>unigene sequences were functionally and structurally annotated using Gene Ontology [22] and the complete assignments were summarized using the plant specific GOSlims [28]. GO terms were derived from matching a unigene sequence to a Swissprot protein using the BLASTX method filtered arbitrarily using the expectation value of 1e-10. Any GO terms associated with the Swissprot entry or keywords were parsed from the Swissprot entry (see Materials and methods for complete details).</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>The <it>P. euphratica </it>DNA microarray</p>
				</st>
				<p>From the collection of 13,838 EST clones, a uni-gene set (selected using the CLOBB algorithm <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr></abbrgrp>; data not shown) was reamplified. In addition, 491 ESTs were amplified twice and are duplicated on the array. All PCR products were re-sequenced to verify the identity of the EST. The ESTs that could be postively identified through sequencing correspond to 7,342 distinct unigenes derived from the clustering of the sequences (HPT2 and CAP3 methods as described in <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B20">20</abbr></abbrgrp>). To estimate the number of different genes on the array by allowing for the possibility of split unigenes, non-overlapping ESTs or unbridged assemblies, the unigenes were anchored into putative homologous groups using the available, but partial, <it>Populus </it>genome assembly. Using a stringent BLASTN expectation value of 1e-20, this identified 6,340 homologous groups. The data on the array may account for as many 6,340 distinct genes, and an undetermined number of paralogues.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p><it>P. euphratica </it>trees growing in the natural habitat of the species are exposed to salinity stress</p>
				</st>
				<p>The <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection as described above contains several known abiotic stress regulated genes, but this is largely inferred from controlled laboratory experiments. To test which genes might be important for acclimation and adaptation to 'real' stress conditions, the <it>P. euphratica </it>microarray was used to further characterize trees grown in one of its natural habitats, the Ein Avdat valley, located in the Negev desert in Israel. In addition to measuring gene expression, we also analyzed leaves and soil for ionic content and the carbon stable isotope ratio &#948;<sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C to estimate the level of salt and drought experienced by the trees.</p>
				<p>We divided the valley into three different areas based on the distance from the small river running through it, distinct phenological differences of the trees growing on the canyon slope, as well as variations in the cambial activity and the width of the annual rings of the trees (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B30">30</abbr></abbrgrp>. Trees growing close to the river have a wide trunk and a large and healthy crown (area A). Trees in the transition area (area B) have narrower trunks than trees in area A, but large and healthy crowns. Trees growing on rocky, dry ground on the upper slope and far from the water source (area C) have a narrow trunk and a small crown and a very constrained growth. Control trees were selected at the Ein Avdat parking lot, 1 km away from the valley (area P), where the trees were periodically irrigated to provide optimal water supply (see Materials and methods). The trees at the parking lot, planted in 1989, originate from root suckers of trees growing in the valley. Leaves were sampled from at least nine individual trees in each area A, B and C, and from seven trees in area P. <it>P. euphratica </it>displays a foliar dimorphism and juvenile leaves differ largely from adults. In this case, only adult, heart shaped leaves where collected from the shaded and unshaded regions of the crown.</p>
				<p>Soil samples for the analysis of ion content were collected beneath each tree (close to the trunk at approximately 10 cm depth) in the four different areas. Na<sup>+ </sup>content was significantly higher (approximately 10 times) in the valley soil (areas A, B, and C) than in the soil from area P (Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>). Other ions, including K<sup>+</sup>, did not differ significantly among the sites. <it>P. euphratica </it>trees growing in areas A and B accumulated more Na<sup>+ </sup>in their leaves compared to trees from the irrigated area P (Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>). Ca<sup>2+ </sup>content was higher in leaves from areas A and C compared to those from area P.</p>
				<fig id="F2">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Estimation of salt and drought stress in area A, B, C, and P</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Estimation of salt and drought stress in area A, B, C, and P. Ion concentrations (mg/g dry weight (DW)) in <b>(a) </b>soil and <b>(b) </b>leaves taken from areas A, B, and C in the Ein Avdat valley and irrigated controls (area P). <b>(c) </b><sup>13</sup>C content, expressed as &#948;<sup>13</sup>C (&#8240;) was analyzed in the same samples used for ion concentration measurements. Significant (<it>p </it>&#8804; 0.05) differences are marked with different letters. The soil and leaf samples were harvested on 13 October 2004.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2005-6-12-r101-2" hint_layout="single"/>
				</fig>
				<p>An estimation of water use efficiency and thus the level of drought stress encountered by trees was obtained by measuring the carbon stable isotope ratio &#948;<sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C (Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>); &#948;<sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C is a time-integrated index for the intrinsic water use efficiency, which is expected to increase during drought due to stomatal closure <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B31">31</abbr></abbrgrp>. The trees from the irrigated area P were more water-use efficient (less negative &#948;<sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C) than those in the valley. This suggests that the trees from the parking lot suffered more from water shortage than the trees in the valley (due to intermittent irrigation). An alternative and more likely interpretation, however, is that trees in the valley were exposed to a stress leading to strongly reduced carbon assimilation, in this case probably a combination of Na<sup>+ </sup>and heat stress. In conclusion, trees from Ein Avdat areas A, B and C were exposed to salt and heat stress, but apparently not to drought stress.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Gene expression in the Ein Avdat valley trees</p>
				</st>
				<p>For the microarray analysis, RNA was extracted from each of the nine individual trees sampled in areas A, B and C. Before labeling, RNA was pooled from three trees to give three biological repeats for each area. The same control RNA was used in all hybridizations and was prepared from a pool of leaves from seven trees growing at the parking lot (area P). Genes, grouped into functional categories, that consistently displayed higher or lower transcript levels in area A, B or C when compared to area P are shown in Additional data file 7 and are displayed graphically in Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>. Despite the highly different phenotypes of the trees in each area, their gene expression profiles were in most cases almost identical. Welch ANOVA analysis indicates that transcript levels for 22 genes (26%) showed significant differences between areas A, B and/or C, usually being either higher or lower in area C (indicated with an asterisk in Additional data file 7 and marked in red in Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). About one third of the genes with higher transcript levels in area A, B and C have a putative role in response to abiotic stress. These include an aldehyde dehydrogenase and metallothioneins with putative roles in defense against oxidative stress. A plastid terminal oxidase that may play a role in photo-oxidative stress also had increased transcript levels.</p>
				<fig id="F3">
					<title>
						<p>Figure 3</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Transcript profiling of trees grown in area A, B, C and P</p>
					</caption>
					<text>
						<p>Transcript profiling of trees grown in area A, B, C and P.</p>
					</text>
					<graphic file="gb-2005-6-12-r101-3" hint_layout="single"/>
				</fig>
				<p>In contrast to the relatively large number of genes with a putative role in defense against abiotic stress, no genes encoding transcription factors or other components of transcriptional regulation showed altered expression, although 153 ESTs on the array have the GO annotation 'regulation of transcription'. Consistent with this, only a few genes with a putative role in signal transduction (receptor-like Ser/Thr kinase, cyclic nucleotide and calmodulin-regulated ion channels and a phospholipase C) had increased transcript levels (Additional data file 7). As the salt stress imposed on the trees in the Ein Avdat valley is of a constitutive nature, the transcript level profiles detected in the microarray analysis are likely to be the end result of long term acclimation to saline desert conditions. Thus, genes responding rapidly after a stress treatment (including transcription factors) might be expected to be absent from the gene expression profile.</p>
				<p>The transcript levels of several aquaporin water channels have been shown to be reduced during drought stress and to a smaller extent during salt stress <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B32">32</abbr></abbrgrp>. This may help in protection against water loss under abiotic stress conditions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B33">33</abbr></abbrgrp>. In areas A, B and C, two aquaporins had decreased transcript levels. Other genes with lower transcript levels included those encoding chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins, chalcone synthase and dehydration-responsive protein RD22.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Quantitative real time RT-PCR analysis</p>
				</st>
				<p>Seven ESTs representing genes with higher or lower transcript levels in the valley-grown trees than in area P trees, and spots with high and low hybridization intensities were used for quantitative real time RT-PCR (qPCR). An EST (AJ775831) encoding glucosidase II alpha subunit, which had displayed a constitutive expression level in all analyses performed with the <it>P. euphratica </it>DNA microarray, was used as an internal control to which gene expression was normalized (&#916;C<sub>T</sub>). The same RNA samples from areas A, B, and C and the area P control that were used in the DNA microarray analysis were used as templates in qPCR (Table <tblr tid="T3">3</tblr>). For most of the genes, transcript fold ratios were close to the microarray results in both analyses, indicating the reliability of the <it>P. euphratica </it>DNA microarray. One gene (AJ780552) displayed a higher fold-induction in the PCR analysis, which probably reflects the higher dynamic range of qPCR compared to array analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B34">34</abbr></abbrgrp>. For only one gene (AJ769631) where the DNA microarray data implied a minor change in expression levels did the qPCR not show the same differential expression.</p>
				<tbl id="T3" hint_layout="double">
					<title>
						<p>Table 3</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Comparison of DNA microarray data with expression data from quantitative real time PCR</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="11">
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>Array data</p>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>Real time PCR repeat 1</p>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>Real time PCR repeat 2</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c cspan="9">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>GenBank ID</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Gene</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>A</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>B</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>C</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>A</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>B</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>C</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>A</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>B</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>C</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="11">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ780552">AJ780552</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Cysteine protease</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>6.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>26.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>17.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>68.4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>100.4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>365.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>89.9</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>340.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>130.2</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ780698">AJ780698</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Cyclic nucleotide and calmodulin-regulated ion channel</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4.7</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>8.9</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>7.7</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>21</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>13.6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>18.4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>15.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>35.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>21.9</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ780435">AJ780435</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Aldehyde dehydrogenase</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4.0</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>5.2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>3.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>6.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>11.2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>15.5</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ769631">AJ769631</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit clpA</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.0</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.9</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.8</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ778655">AJ778655</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Alcohol dehydrogenase</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.7</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.6</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.8</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ777239">AJ777239</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Stable protein/bspA</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.4</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.3</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.1</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.05</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>
									<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ768555">AJ768555</ext-link>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Dehydration-responsive protein RD22</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>Two biological repeats were independently reverse transcribed and amplified. The raw threshold cycle (Ct) values were normalized against a glucosidase alpha subunit standard to get normalized &#916;Ct values, which were used to calculate the fold change in expression between areas A, B, and C compared to area P.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Metabolic profiling</p>
				</st>
				<p>The accumulation of 22 different metabolites in leaves of <it>P. euphratica </it>trees was examined by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The metabolites were analyzed initially in the leaves used also for the transcriptome analysis in areas A, B and C but not in P. The analysis was repeated during the following year for areas A, B, C and P. We present data from this last sampling as metabolite contents in areas A, B, and C did not change with sampling dates. Metabolite profiles of leaf extracts from six individual plants from each area (A, B, C, and P) were compared (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). Trees from area A (which accumulated more Na<sup>+</sup>; Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>) displayed significantly higher levels of the amino acids &#946;-alanine, valine and proline than trees from other areas, including the less saline area P. Proline has previously been shown to accumulate to high levels in Na<sup>+ </sup>or osmotically stressed <it>P. euphratica </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B35">35</abbr></abbrgrp>. Likewise, glycerol, glyceric acid, and myo-inositol had also significantly higher concentrations in trees from area A compared to trees from the other areas. Fructose and mannitol, on the contrary, were detected in significantly lower concentrations in trees from the area A. No significant and/or clear differences between the trees from different areas were detected in any of the other metabolites analyzed.</p>
				<tbl id="T4" hint_layout="double">
					<title>
						<p>Table 4</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>Metabolite profiling of leaf samples taken from areas A, B, and C and from irrigated controls grown in less saline soil (area P)</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="13">
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>A</p>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>B</p>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>C</p>
							</c>
							<c cspan="3" ca="center">
								<p>P</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="13">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Average</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SE</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>x fold change from P</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Average</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SE</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>x fold change from P</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Average</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SE</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>x fold change from P</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Average</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SE</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>x fold change from P</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="13">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Organic acids</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Citric acid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.442</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.14</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.59</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.263</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.07</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.95</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.278</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.06</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.278</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.442</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.14</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Fumaric acid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.008</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.14</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.007</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.007</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.007</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.008</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Glyceric acid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.037<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.60</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.023<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.023<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.023<sup>ab</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.037<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Malic acid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.638</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.15</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.94</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.693</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.22</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.02</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.669</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.15</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.99</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.677</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.638</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.15</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Nicotinic acid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.024</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.77</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.018</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.60</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.027</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.87</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.031</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.024</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Succinic acid</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.381</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.07</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.10</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.385</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.08</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.12</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.350</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.02</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.344</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.381</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.07</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Sugars</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Fructose</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.374<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.29</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.89</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.326<sup>ab</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.62</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.50</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>3.394<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.70</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>2.20</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.544<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.374<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.29</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Glucose</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.397</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.12</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.56</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.697</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.27</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.99</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.687</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.47</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.97</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.703</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.397</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.12</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Raffinose</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.102<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.06</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.65</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.309<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.98</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.309<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.08</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.98</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.156<sup>ab</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.102<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.06</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Sucrose</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>610.7</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>74.70</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.96</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>603.5</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>63.30</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.95</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>597.2</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>47.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.94</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>633.9</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>610.7</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>74.70</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Trehalose</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.057</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.89</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.058</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.90</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.062</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.97</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.064</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.057</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Xylulose</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.742<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.05</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.03</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.659<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.11</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.91</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.662<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.09</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.92</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.721<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.742<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.05</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Sugar-alcohols</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Galactinol</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.087</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.63</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.073</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.53</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.150</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.09</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.138</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.087</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.02</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Mannitol</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.368<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.99</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.333<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.89</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.333<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.89</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.371<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.368<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Myo-inositol</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.826<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.10</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.30</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.065<sup>bc</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.27</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.95</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1.968<sup>c</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.16</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.90</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.170<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2.826<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.10</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Sorbitol</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.229</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.99</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.210</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.05</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.70</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.220</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.95</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.231</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.229</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Poly-ol</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Glycerol</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.162<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.05</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>6.75</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.023<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.95</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.024<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.024<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.162<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.05</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Amino acids</p>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
							<c>
								<p/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>&#946;-alanine</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.350<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>2.13</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.395<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.06</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>2.40</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.121<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.04</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.74</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.164<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.350<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.03</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Proline</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.045<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.67</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.020<sup>ab</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.75</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.007<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.29</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.027<sup>ab</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.045<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Serine</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.014</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>3.50</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.005</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.25</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.004</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.25</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.004</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.014</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Threonine</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.008</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.60</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.005</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.005</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.00</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.005</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.008</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c indent="1" ca="left">
								<p>Valine</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.041<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>2.40</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.020<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>1.18</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.015<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.00</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>
									<it>0.88</it>
								</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.017<sup>b</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.041<sup>a</sup></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>0.01</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>Polar extracts were derivatized and analyzed as described in 'Materials and methods'. Metabolite values were calculated as the relative response ratio (RR) of peak areas of the different compounds with respect to the peak area of ribitol (as internal standard), and are expressed as the average RR/g dry weight of six replicates (normalized with respect to the dry weight (g<sup>-1 </sup>dry weight). Compounds labeled with a different symbol differ significantly (<it>p </it>&lt; 0.05). The fold change relative to trees in area P is indicated in a separate column in italics. This value was calculated from the average values of the metabolites in areas A, B, and C relative to the average value in area P, where P is equal to 1. All leaf samples were harvested on 13 October 2004. Compounds labeled with a different letter (a, b or c) differ significantly (<it>p </it>&lt; 0.05). SE, standard error.</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
				<p>For one of the metabolites detected, galactinol, the corresponding biosynthesis gene (galactinol synthase) had approximately threefold higher transcript levels in areas A, B and C (Additional data file 7). Galactinol itself did not display any significant increase in the leaves. Nevertheless, galactinol is a precursor of raffinose, which showed significant increases in areas B and C (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). Significant changes were also detected in myo-inositol, which is a precursor of galactinol <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B36">36</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Discussion</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p><it>P. euphratica </it>trees growing in the Ein Avdat valley are exposed to Na+ stress</p>
				</st>
				<p>Soil in the Ein Avdat valley contains high concentrations of Na<sup>+ </sup>(Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>). This is also reflected in the vegetation composition in the valley, which includes several halophytic species (<it>Juncus maritimus </it>Lam, <it>Suaeda vera</it>, <it>Atriplex halimus</it>, <it>Imperata cylindrical</it>, <it>Limonium pruinosum </it>and <it>Zygophyllum dumosum </it>Boiss.). Maintenance of cellular ion homeostasis is important for vital activities in all organisms. High salinity, in addition to osmotic stress, causes ion imbalances and consequently cell death. K<sup>+ </sup>is one of the major cations in the cytosol and is responsible for the maintenance of membrane potential. Under normal growth conditions, K<sup>+ </sup>concentration in plant cells is higher than Na<sup>+ </sup>concentration. High Na<sup>+ </sup>in soil causes inhibition of K<sup>+ </sup>uptake, resulting in a severe increment in the Na<sup>+</sup>/K<sup>+ </sup>ratio, which is detrimental for photosynthetic activity and causes inhibition of growth and ultimately cell death <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B37">37</abbr></abbrgrp>. <it>P. euphratica </it>trees grown in highly saline soils (Figure <figr fid="F2">2a</figr>) accumulated high Na<sup>+ </sup>concentration in leaves (approximately twofold more Na<sup>+ </sup>than K<sup>+</sup>; Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>) and still continued growing without visible symptoms of severe stress. This clearly indicates that <it>P. euphratica </it>has developed an efficient mechanism to tolerate high salt levels. Accordingly, <it>in vitro </it>exposure of <it>P. euphratica </it>to salt showed that Na<sup>+ </sup>is preferentially accumulated in the cell wall, which thus protects the cytosol from Na<sup>+ </sup>toxicity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>. The carbon isotope ratio &#948;<sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C revealed that the trees were likely not suffering from severe drought stress (Figure <figr fid="F2">2c</figr>). This may be due to the fact that <it>P. euphratica </it>trees produce a deep and extensive root system, giving the trees access to deep water even when they were far from the river (area C) <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B9">9</abbr><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>The <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection contains stress related ESTs</p>
				</st>
				<p>Survival and growth of <it>P. euphratica </it>trees under the unfavorable conditions of high soil salinity and heat stress suggest that they are well adapted to the local desert conditions. Thus, sequencing of cDNA libraries in combination with DNA microarray analysis was used to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this adaptation. Construction of the cDNA libraries was based on maximizing the number of sequences relevant to stress tolerance and adaptation, in particular salt stress. To reach this goal, normalized libraries from Ein Avdat valley-grown adult trees and subtracted libraries from NaCl and several other abiotic stress-treated juvenile trees were constructed (Additional data file 1).</p>
				<p>The EST collection obtained was compared to other poplar stress EST collections and salt DNA microarray experiments to estimate the amount of stress related genes obtained (Additional data file 5). Gu <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B6">6</abbr></abbrgrp> used a similar strategy and employed the suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) method to identify genes upregulated by salt in <it>P. euphratica</it>. Of the 58 sequences reported, 43 (74%) were present in our EST collection. Christopher <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B17">17</abbr></abbrgrp> sequenced 928 ESTs from systemically wounded leaves of hybrid poplar (<it>P. trichocarpa </it>&#215; <it>P. deltoides</it>) and performed a macroarray analysis on systemically wounded leaves. Of the genes listed as having probable or potential herbivory or wounding functions, 20 of 33 sequences (60%) were represented in our EST collection. In the macroarray analysis, they identified 18 genes with more than a tenfold increased transcript level in response to wounding; 12 of these 18 sequences (67%) were present in our EST collection. In our collection, the majority of highly wound-induced genes were obtained from the normalized control libraries, indicating that <it>P. euphratica </it>trees may constitutively express defense genes. Whether genes that could contribute to salt tolerance of <it>P. euphratica </it>also are constitutively expressed remains to be determined. Wounding- and poplar mosaic virus-regulated genes have also been identified in <it>P. trichocarpa </it>&#215; <it>P. deltoides </it>using microarray analysis <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr></abbrgrp>. Of the 150 genes induced twofold or more by virus and/or wounding, 113 (75%) were present in the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection (Additional data file 5), indicating that even though all cDNA libraries were constructed from trees exposed to abiotic stress, there were many ESTs related to biotic stress present in the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection.</p>
				<p>As only three <it>Populus </it>array experiments relating to stress have been published, a comparison was also made to transcript profiling of salt stressed <it>A. thaliana</it>. Seki <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr></abbrgrp> analyzed 7,000 genes in <it>A. thaliana </it>and found that 227 genes displayed more than fivefold increased transcript levels and 103 genes decreased levels in response to the NaCl treatment. A comparison of these genes with the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection showed that 81 (36%) of the <it>Arabidopsis </it>genes with increased transcript levels in response to salt stress have a direct match in our EST collection (Additional data file 5). Among the genes with reduced transcript levels, 56 (54%) were present in our EST collection. Not surprisingly, the <it>P. euphratica </it>genes with a match to the Na-regulated <it>Arabidopsis </it>genes were predominantly from the normalized Ein Avdat library and the subtracted libraries, whereas the down regulated genes mostly had matches in the control libraries. Overall, this comparison with known stress regulated genes indicates that a wide collection of stress related genes was obtained in the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Transcript profiling of Ein Avdat trees</p>
				</st>
				<p>A uni-gene set of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection was printed on microarrays, which were used to profile gene expression in leaves harvested from Ein Avdat areas A, B and C. Leaves from trees growing in the least saline soil (area P) were used as controls. In <it>A. thaliana</it>, typically 5% to 30% of the genes displayed changed levels of transcripts in response to various abiotic stress treatments <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B26">26</abbr><abbr bid="B40">40</abbr></abbrgrp>. In striking contrast, the number of <it>P. euphratica </it>genes that displayed different transcript levels expressed in the Ein Avdat experiment was only approximately 1% of the genes on the array. Furthermore, the trees in areas A, B and C had similar transcript profiles (Additional data file 7). For some genes, for example an early light-induced protein, there was a significantly higher expression in area C compared to the other areas (Additional data file 7). These genes with higher expression in area C might be important for adaptation to the highly stressful conditions on the dry, rocky slope (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). The majority of the genes with altered transcript levels belong to only a few functional categories: 'protein metabolism', 'response to abiotic or biotic stimulus', 'metabolism' and 'biological process unknown'. One reason for the relatively low number of genes with different transcript levels could be that the Ein Avdat trees have been growing in the valley for decades and are well acclimated to these growth conditions, and thus may have their defense mechanisms fully activated. This could also explain why so relatively few genes involved in signal transduction and no genes involved in control of transcription were identified as displaying different transcript levels. A systematic genotyping of the Ein Avdat trees with Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers did not detect any polymorphism among the trees, suggesting that the <it>P. euphratica </it>trees are ramets of the same genotype, probably propagated through root suckers (I Beritognolo and R Muleo, personal communication; see also <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B39">39</abbr><abbr bid="B41">41</abbr></abbrgrp>). Thus, the trees at each area may be expected to respond similarly to stress conditions, which also might explain their almost identical transcript profiles (Additional data file 7).</p>
				<p>Interestingly, some of the genes with increased transcript levels in areas A, B, and C (galactinol synthase, aldehyde dehydrogenase, &#946;-amylase, ferritin and cysteine protease) have previously been shown to be upregulated in <it>Arabidopsis </it>during combined heat and drought stress <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp>. The galactinol synthase gene was only found in the Ein Avdat EST library, indicating that galactinol (or raffinose as indicated by the metabolite profiling; Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>) might be used as a compatible solute during salt stress. Galactinol synthase is also one of the genes with increased transcript levels in controlled laboratory experiments with salt exposed <it>P. euphratica </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>. Abiotic stress causes the formation of reactive oxygen species that can react further with cellular components such as lipids and proteins. None of the 'classic' enzymes involved in antioxidant defense, including catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase, showed altered transcript levels. However, two other proteins, aldehyde dehydrogenase and metallothioneins, might fulfill a similar role in antioxidant defense. A result of oxidative damage is the formation of reactive and toxic aldehydes. In <it>A. thaliana</it>, an aldehyde dehydrogenase (<it>AthALDH3</it>) gene was induced by salt stress and other abiotic stresses <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp>. Transgenic plants overexpressing <it>AthALDH3 </it>displayed increased tolerance to salt and dehydration stress and accumulated less reactive aldehydes derived from lipid peroxidation <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B43">43</abbr></abbrgrp>. The increased transcript abundance of an aldehyde dehydrogenase in <it>P. euphratica </it>suggests that it could use this defense strategy to reduce damaging effects from oxidative stress. Metallothioneins are low molecular mass cysteine-rich proteins that can bind heavy metals and have a proposed role in detoxification of heavy metals. Expression of poplar metallothioneins in a cadmium sensitive yeast strain conferred cadmium tolerance <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. The transcript levels of poplar metallothioneins increase during senescence, heavy metal treatment and virus infection <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B25">25</abbr><abbr bid="B44">44</abbr></abbrgrp>. The presence of several cysteines in the metallothioneins suggests that they might be involved in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species or in maintenance of redox levels. Recently, recombinant rice and watermelon metallothinoneins have been shown to possess high superoxide and hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B45">45</abbr><abbr bid="B46">46</abbr></abbrgrp>. Metallothionein ESTs were highly abundant in Ein Avdat and control libraries (Additional data file 2). Furthermore, the microarray analyses indicated that they were more highly expressed in trees growing in areas A, B and C than in trees growing in the less saline area P (Additional data file 7). This suggests that metallothioneins might play a role in detoxification of reactive oxygen species in stressed trees.</p>
				<p>The genes with highest fold-induction in transcript levels in the Ein Avdat valley encode cysteine proteases. Cysteine proteases have previously been shown to be induced under both salt and drought stress <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B47">47</abbr></abbrgrp>. Their role could be to enhance degradation of stress-denatured proteins. Alternatively, elevated cysteine protease expression is frequently observed during senescence in <it>Populus </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B13">13</abbr><abbr bid="B15">15</abbr></abbrgrp>. As the samples for array analysis were harvested late in autumn, it is possible that the trees in the valley (particularly in area C) might develop senescence faster than the trees at the parking lot, and this might lead to elevated cysteine protease expression.</p>
				<p>Recently, the halophyte salt cress (<it>T. halophila</it>) has been established as a model for research on salt tolerance due to its high sequence identity with <it>A. thaliana </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B48">48</abbr><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. Comparative microarray experiments performed on <it>A. thaliana </it>and <it>T. halophila </it>with the same NaCl treatment revealed that the salt sensitive <it>A. thaliana </it>responded to the stress by modified expression of a relatively large number of genes, while the expression of only a few genes (six times less) changed in the tolerant <it>T. halophila</it>. Furthermore, direct hybridization of control RNA from both species on the same array showed that the tolerant species over-expressed several stress-related genes under non-stressed conditions <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B49">49</abbr></abbrgrp>. Thus, the salt tolerant species constitutively expresses defense genes and does not show further induction of genes upon stress treatment. Forty-nine percent of the stress related genes constitutively expressed in <it>T. halophila </it>were present in the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection (Additional data file 5). <it>P. euphratica </it>resembles <it>T. halophila </it>in several ways; both are tolerant to salt stress and display constitutive expression of genes related to, and induced by, biotic stress. Further support for the hypothesis that <it>P. euphratica </it>constitutively expresses defense genes and responds with few changes in gene expression following stress comes from our preliminary array experiments using salt stressed <it>P. euphratica </it>and <it>P. tremula </it>(which is salt sensitive); <it>P. tremula </it>displayed 10 times more genes with modified transcript levels than <it>P. euphratica </it>(B Vinocur, M Brosch&#233;, J Kangasj&#228;rvi, A Altman, unpublished data). To be fully confirmed, this hypothesis requires additional study, especially direct microarray hybridization comparisons between <it>P. euphratica </it>and stress sensitive poplars such as <it>P. tremula </it>or <it>P &#215; canescens</it>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Metabolic profiling of Ein Avdat trees</p>
				</st>
				<p>To complement the transcript profiling we also analyzed the accumulation of 22 metabolites in the leaves collected from the experimental sites. Increased concentration of several amino acids such as &#946;-alanine, valine and proline was observed, particularly in area A (Table <tblr tid="T4">4</tblr>). Rizhsky <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr></abbrgrp> reported similar increases in different amino acids such as isoleucine, leucine, valine, &#946;-alanine and tyrosine as a response to heat and drought stress, and proline, cysteine and serine have increased concentrations following cold stress <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr></abbrgrp>. Among the amino acids analyzed, &#946;-alanine had the highest accumulation in <it>P. euphratica </it>leaves from areas A and B. &#946;-Alanine is the precursor of &#946;-alanine-betaine, a quaternary ammonium compound that has similar osmoprotective function as glycine-betaine and accumulates in species belonging to the highly salt tolerant family <it>Plumbaginaceae </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B51">51</abbr></abbrgrp>. Therefore, it is possible that amino acid accumulation supports increased production of metabolites that are part of a defense under very saline conditions.</p>
				<p>The concentration of several metabolites such as fructose, glycerol, malate, maltose, mannose, galactinol, myo-inositol, putrescine, raffinose, sucrose, and trehalose increase dramatically in response to heat, drought and cold stress in <it>Arabidopsis </it><abbrgrp><abbr bid="B42">42</abbr><abbr bid="B50">50</abbr></abbrgrp>. In <it>P. euphratica</it>, however, the changes in stress responsive carbohydrates and organic acids were of limited extent at the four different field sites. Considering the high accumulation of Na<sup>+ </sup>in field-grown leaves (Figure <figr fid="F2">2b</figr>), as well as in controlled salt experiments <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B38">38</abbr></abbrgrp>, it is possible that sodium itself can act as an osmolyte as in halophytes.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusion</p>
			</st>
			<p><it>P. euphratica </it>trees growing in the Ein Avdat valley are naturally exposed to high salinity, as well as to heat stress. Despite this, most of the trees did not display severe symptoms of stress (except for the stunted phenotype of trees growing in the driest area), and from a molecular perspective, relatively few changes occurred at the transcript and metabolite levels. It is possible that mechanisms not studied here (for instance, Na<sup>+ </sup>transporter activity) may contribute to the tolerance and adaptation to the high salinity encountered in this population. The EST collection and microarray described here represent excellent tools for further molecular research into the strategies used by <it>P. euphratica </it>to grow in desert conditions.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Materials and methods</p>
			</st>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Plant material</p>
				</st>
				<p>The Ein Avdat valley is located in the Negev desert in Israel at 450 m above sea level and a latitude of 30&#176; 49' 30" N, and a longitude of 34&#176; 46' 0" E. The average rainfall is 100 to 200 mm per year with most of the rain falling during winter time. Adult heart shaped leaves were collected from trees in areas A, B, and C for the cDNA library during the summer seasons of 2000 to 2001. Material was also harvested from young <it>in vitro </it>plantlets of a clone (clone B2) derived from a single tree from area B. Samples for microarray analysis were taken from areas A, B, and C and from the Ein Avdat parking lot (area P, 1 km from the valley) on 27 November 2003, and for ion, isotope and metabolite profiling on 27 November 2003 and 13 October 2004. The parking lot trees were irrigated with non saline tap water for 24 hours once a week.</p>
				<p>For normalized control libraries, leaves, shoots and roots were harvested from 8 month old <it>P. euphratica </it>seedlings. Seeds were obtained from the Forest Administration Division, Xinjiang Corps of Production and Construction, Urumqi, PR China. The seeds were sown on sand that had a high content of clay (6%) and germinated at 12 hours light with 250 &#956;mol m<sup>-2 </sup>s<sup>-1 </sup>photosynthetically active radiation, 25&#176;C, and a relative air humidity of 60% in a climate chamber (Weiss, Giessen, Germany). The seedlings were potted into soil (Fruhstorfer Erde N, Archut, Germany), transferred to a greenhouse with natural light and watered daily with Long Ashton macronutrient solution <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B52">52</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>For stress treatments, leaves and roots were harvested from <it>P. euphratica </it>subjected to the following treatments: elevated CO<sub>2 </sub>(plants submitted to an atmosphere of 700 ppm for 60 days); different irradiance levels (plants under three different irradiance regimes corresponding to 48%, 18% and 8% external irradiance) for 60 days; drought stress (plants submitted to a 21 day cycle of drought with 5% to 3% volumetric soil humidity) before harvesting; flooding stress (plants submitted during 21 days to a complete submergence of the root system); ozone (plants submitted to 200 nl l<sup>-1 </sup>of O<sub>3 </sub>for 7 and 20 h); cold and freezing (leaves harvested from plants acclimated at 5 days of +2&#176;C and from plants exposed to two and seven days of -2&#176;C following the acclimation period); salt stress (leaves and xylogenic cambium harvested from plants exposed to 150 mM NaCl for 0.5 h, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h, 5 h, 10 h, 24 h and 48 h and roots harvested after 40 minutes, 1.5 h, 8 h and 20 h); cadmium stress (plants were stressed with 50 &#956;M CdCl<sub>2 </sub>and roots harvested after 12, 24 and 48 h).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Ion and isotope measurements</p>
				</st>
				<p>Leaves were frozen in liquid nitrogen and freeze dried for two days. Dry powder samples (250 mg) were then extracted with 5 ml 65% HNO<sub>3 </sub>at room temperature overnight to release the free ions and then digested for 2 h at 180&#176;C. The supernatants were diluted in deionized water and ion analysis was carried out using an ICP-AES Spectroflame (Spectro Analytical Instruments, Kleve, Germany). The data were analyzed with the Tukey multiple comparison algorithm (<it>p </it>= 0.05). Soil samples were dried at 70&#176;C and subsequently digested with a nitric acid pressure system according to Heinrichs <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B53">53</abbr></abbrgrp>. Quantification of elements was carried out by ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry; Spectro Analytical Instruments) at l = 559 nm. One way ANOVA tests were performed with the Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) <it>post hoc </it>test. For isotope measurements freeze-dried leaves were finely ground using a mill (CB2200, CEP Industrie, Dept Sodemi, Saint-Ouen l'Aum&#244;ne, France). <sup>13</sup>C content in bulk leaf tissue was measured with an isotope mass spectrometer (Finnigan Mat; Delta S, Bremen, Germany). <sup>13</sup>C content was expressed as the <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C ratio relative to the Pee Dee Belemnite standard as a per mil deviation from this standard. The precision of the spectrometric analysis (standard deviation in &#948;) of the laboratory standard (ground leaves of <it>Quercus </it>ssp.) was 0.15&#8240; (n = 201).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Construction of cDNA libraries</p>
				</st>
				<p>RNA was isolated from <it>P. euphratica </it>leaves or roots using the method described in Chang <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B54">54</abbr></abbrgrp>. Total RNA from root samples was DNase I treated before mRNA isolation. mRNA was isolated using oligo-tex beads (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Normalization of mRNA populations was performed as described in Sasaki <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B55">55</abbr></abbrgrp>. Normalized cDNA libraries were constructed from mRNA using the SuperScript plasmid system with Gateway technology for cDNA synthesis and cloning (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Subtracted libraries were constructed by two different methods. First by using the PCR select cDNA subtraction kit (BD Bioscience Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA; also called SSH <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B56">56</abbr></abbrgrp>), with the resulting PCR products cloned into pGEMT-Easy T-vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The second subtraction method used restriction enzyme digestion with cap-selection. Tester cDNA was prepared by synthesizing cDNA from 500 ng mRNA with an oligo-dT adaptor primer (5' GACTAGTTCTAGATCGCGAGCGGCCGCCCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTVN3') in the presence of a 'cap select' primer (5'AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGTGTCGACGGG3'), which binds to the end of a newly synthesized cDNA (see <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B57">57</abbr></abbrgrp> for a description of the CapSelect technique). A driver was prepared by single-strand PCR amplification from control libraries and by double-stranded cDNA synthesis from control mRNA. The driver was then hybridized to the tester in a ratio of at least 50:1 for 24 to 48 h. After hybridization, double stranded molecules (representing common transcripts) were degraded by digestion with a panel of restriction enzymes (<it>Rsa</it>I, <it>Nla</it>III, <it>Bfa</it>I, <it>Sau3</it>AI; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA). The remaining undigested single-stranded cDNAs were size selected and subsequently amplified by PCR using primers designed for the 5'cap and 3' poly-A tail (5'AAGCAGTGGTATCAACGCAGAGT3' and 5'GACTAGTTCTAGATCGCGAGC3'). The resulting PCR products were digested with <it>Not</it>I and <it>Sal</it>I, size selected, and cloned into pSPORT1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The subtracted libraries were subjected to a stringent quality control to determine how many clones from each library to sequence. Two parameters were tested, 'subtraction efficiency' and 'complexity'. Essentially, subtraction efficiency was judged by assessing the removal of abundant control cDNAs. Complexity was judged by determining the percentage of different cDNAs in the library. To test this, 96 clones were sequenced from each library. To pass 'subtraction efficiency', a maximum of one of the obtained sequences should correspond to any of the five most abundant cDNAs from the normalized libraries (rbcS, lhcb, ferredoxin, metallothionein, PSII 10 kDa protein). Furthermore, at least 70% of the sequences had to be sequences not already present from the normalized libraries. To pass 'complexity', the number of independent sequences had to be at least 60%. The following libraries passed the quality control: P8, P9, P10, P11, P15, P16 and P17.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>EST sequencing and annotation</p>
				</st>
				<p>EST sequencing was performed as described in Laitinen <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>. The sequences have GenBank accession numbers <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ767069">AJ767069</ext-link> to <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" ext-link-id="AJ780913">AJ780913</ext-link>. All the sequences were quality checked before clustering and integration into a Sputnik EST database as described in <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B23">23</abbr><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>. Unigene sequences are assigned a unique id based on their 5'-most EST sequence. A prefix 'C_' denotes that the unigene represents a multi-member 'cluster' of sequences. Singleton sequences are prefixed with 'S_'. Peptide sequences were derived for all unigenes using the ESTScan application <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B59">59</abbr></abbrgrp>. Prior to the ESTScan predictions, a <it>P. euphratica </it>specific ESTScan model was created by training with open reading frames identified through BLASTX of the unigenes against the Swissprot database with results filtered using the expectation value of 1e-10. The peptide predictions were used to estimate the amount of protein coding sequence (CDS) within both individual EST and cluster consensus sequences. Sequences were annotated for homology using the BLASTN and BLASTX algorithms against a non-redundant protein sequence database, the Swissprot database, the <it>A. thaliana </it>and <it>O. sativa </it>genome databases, and sequence databases containing the aggregated openSputnik consensus sequences for Asterid, Eurosid, Caryophyllid, and monocot genomes. Sequences were additionally functionally characterized in context with the MIPS Funcat and Gene Ontology GO terms <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B28">28</abbr></abbrgrp>. GO terms were derived using two independent methods: one using the Swissprot to Gene Ontology mappings, the other using the InterPro to Gene Ontology mappings.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Construction of microarrays</p>
				</st>
				<p>The ESTs were clustered using the CLOBB algorithm and based on the clusters, a uni-gene set were selected for reamplification as previously described <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B29">29</abbr><abbr bid="B58">58</abbr></abbrgrp>. All PCR-products were sequenced to verify correct identity. The Populus microarray contains 7,662 different populus ESTs (of which 491 ESTs were amplified twice and are duplicated on the array, for a total number of 8,153 populus ESTs; these ESTs correspond to 7,342 distinct unigenes derived from the clustering of the sequences (HPT2 and CAP3), and spiking and negative controls that were amplified from the <it>Arabidopsis </it>functional genomics consortium control set <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B60">60</abbr></abbrgrp> and from additional <it>Caenorhabditis elegans </it>clones. The number of genes corresponding to the arrayed ESTs was estimated by anchoring ESTs to the available Poplar genome scaffold using the BLASTN method, with results filtered at 1e-20. Sequences were merged if they overlapped or appeared within the same 5 kbp interval on the assembled genome scaffold.</p>
				<p>For printing, 5 &#956;L of purified fragments were transferred to a 384 printing plate together with 5 &#956;L of 6 &#215; SSC solution. The ESTs were printed onto poly-lysine coated slides with a Genemachines OmniGrid 100 (Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) using 16 SMP3 pins (TeleChem International, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Printing conditions were 48% to 50% humidity and 21&#176;C.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Probe labeling and hybridization</p>
				</st>
				<p>Three biological repeats were used from each of the areas (A, B and C; Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>) in the Ein Avdat valley; each of the independent biological repeats contain leaves from two or three trees. The parking lot (area P) control sample was a pool of leaves from seven trees. To avoid bias in the microarray evaluation as a consequence of dye-related differences in labeling efficiency and/or differences in recording fluorescence signals, dye labeling for each paired sample (Area/Parking lot control) was reversed in two individual hybridizations. Thus, a total of six hybridizations per area were obtained. The complete protocols for probe labeling and hybridization, normalized data and raw data files are available from the ArrayExpress database <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B61">61</abbr></abbrgrp> under the accession E-MEXP-182.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Microarray data analysis</p>
				</st>
				<p>Images were analyzed in GenePixPro 5.1 (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA, USA). Visually bad spots or areas on the array and low intensity spots were excluded. Low intensity spots were determined as spots where less than 55% of the pixels had intensity above the background + 1SD in either channel. Using these criteria, 31% to 58% of the spots gave a positive signal from the 18 hybridizations. The data from GenePixPro 5.1 were imported into GeneSpring 7 (Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA, USA) and normalized with the Lowess method. The background subtracted median intensities were used for calculations. Up- and downregulated genes were selected using two criteria: the gene should consistently have twofold increased or decreased transcript levels in all biological repeats, there should be a signal from the spot from at least four of six hybridizations for each area, and the gene induction or repression should be statistically significantly different from a ratio of 1.0 determined with Students <it>t</it> test in GeneSpring. Gene expression in areas A, B, and C was compared using Welch ANOVA assuming that groups have unequal variances. After Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate correction for multiple testing, a false discovery rate of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Tukey's <it>post-hoc </it>test was applied to identify the areas that differ from each other.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Quantitative real time RT-PCR</p>
				</st>
				<p>The microarray results were verified with qPCR. Reverse transcription was performed with 6 &#956;g of DNase I treated total RNA with SuperScript III according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). The reverse transcription reaction was diluted to a final volume of 100 &#956;l, and 1 &#956;l was used as template for the PCR using SYBRgreen PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR was performed in duplicate using ABI Prism 7000 default cycling conditions (Applied Biosystems). The primers used for PCR are listed in Additional data file 6. The raw threshold cycle (Ct) values were normalized against glucosidase II alpha subunit (shown to have a constant expression in all experiments performed on the <it>P. euphratica </it>DNA microarray) to obtain normalized &#916;Ct values that were then used to calculate the difference in expression levels between areas A, B and C and the parking lot control.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Metabolite profiling: GC-MS analysis</p>
				</st>
				<p>The extraction protocol was modified from Roessner-Tunali <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr></abbrgrp> and Schauer <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp>. Briefly, frozen leaf tissue powder (100 mg dry weight) was extracted in 1.4 ml of 80% (v/v) aqueous methanol in a 2.0 ml microcentrifuge tube. Ribitol (120 &#956;l of 0.2 mg ml<sup>-1 </sup>water) was added as an internal standard prior to incubation. The mixture was extracted for 15 minutes at 70&#176;C under 200 rpm. The extract was vigorously mixed with 1,500 &#956;l water and 750 &#956;l chloroform andsubsequently centrifuged 15 minutes at 4,000 rpm. Aliquots of the methanol/water supernatant (150 &#956;l) were dried in vacuum overnight. The dry residue was modified for GC-MS analysis according to Schauer <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp>. Residues after reduction were redissolved and derivatized for 90 minutes at 37&#176;C in 60 &#956;l of 30 mg ml<sup>-1 </sup>methoxyamine hydrochloride in pyridine followed by a 30 minute treatment with 120 &#956;l of N-methyl-N-[trimethylsilyl]trifluoroacetamide at 37&#176;C. A retention time standard mixture (10 &#956;l of 0.029% (v/v) n-dodecane, n-pentadecane, n-nonadecane, n-docosane, n-octacosane, n-dotracontane, and n-hexatriacontane dissolved in pyridin) was added before trimethylsilylation. Sample volumes of 1 &#956;l were then injected onto the GC column on a splitless mode.</p>
				<p>The GC-MS system was run as previously described <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B63">63</abbr></abbrgrp> with some modifications. It was composed of a Pal autosampler (Ophir analytic Tel Aviv, Israel, representative of CTC analytic, Zwingen, Switzerland), a TRACE GC 2000 gas chromatograph, and a TRACE DSQ quadrupole mass spectrometer (Restek, Bargal Analytics, Tel Aviv, Israel, representative of ThermoFinnigan, Hemel Hempstead, UK). GC was performed on a 30-m Rtx_5Sil MS column with 0.25 &#956;m film thickness (ThermoFinnigan). The injection temperature was set at 297&#176;C, the interface at 280&#176;C, and the ion source adjusted to 200&#176;C. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 ml min<sup>-1</sup>. The analysis was performed under the following temperature program: 5 minutes of isothermal heating at 70&#176;C, followed by a 5&#176;C per minute oven temperature ramp to 350&#176;C, and a final 5 minute heating at 330&#176;C. Mass spectra were recorded at 2 scan sec<sup>-1 </sup>with a scanning range of 40 to 600 m/z. Both chromatograms and mass spectra were evaluated using the XCALIBUR v1.3 program (ThermoFinnigan). A retention time and mass spectral library for automatic peak quantification of metabolite derivatives were implemented within the NIST 2.0 method format. Substances were identified by comparison with authentic standards, as described in Roessner-Tunali <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B62">62</abbr></abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>The levels of the compounds were calculated as the relative response ratio of peak areas of different compounds related to the peak area of ribitol (which served as an internal standard), and normalized with respect to the dry weight of the sample (according to Nikiforova <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp><abbr bid="B64">64</abbr></abbrgrp>). Data are presented as the average of six separate measurements and analyzed statistically with the Tukey multiple comparison algorithm (<it>p </it>= 0.05) incorporated into JMP statistical software (JMP, Statistics and Graphics Guide: Version 3, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Additional data files</p>
			</st>
			<p>The following additional data are available with the online version of this paper. Additional data file <supplr sid="S1">1</supplr> is a description of the cDNA libraries used for EST sequencing. Additional data file <supplr sid="S2">2</supplr> lists data from the electronic northern analysis showing the most abundant ESTs in leaf libraries. Additional data file <supplr sid="S3">3</supplr> lists data from the electronic northern analysis showing the most abundant ESTs in root libraries.Additional data file <supplr sid="S4">4</supplr> is a comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection with ESTs from other <it>Populus </it>species. Additional data file <supplr sid="S5">5</supplr> is a comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection with other stress enriched EST collections or microarray experiments. Additional data file <supplr sid="S6">6</supplr> list the primers used for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Additional data file <supplr sid="S7">7</supplr> shows the microarray analysis of leaf samples taken from areas A, B, C and P in the Ein Avdat valley.</p>
			<suppl id="S1">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 1</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>A description of the cDNA libraries used for EST sequencing.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>A description of the cDNA libraries used for EST sequencing.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S1.xls">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S2">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 2</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Data from the electronic northern analysis showing the most abundant ESTs in leaf libraries.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>Data from the electronic northern analysis showing the most abundant ESTs in leaf libraries.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S2.xls">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S3">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 3</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Data from the electronic northern analysis showing the most abundant ESTs in root libraries.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>Data from the electronic northern analysis showing the most abundant ESTs in root libraries.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S3.xls">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S4">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 4</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>A comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection with ESTs from other <it>Populus </it>species.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>A comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection with ESTs from other <it>Populus </it>species.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S4.xls">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S5">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 5</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>A comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection with other stress enriched EST collections or microarray experiments.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>A comparison of the <it>P. euphratica </it>EST collection with other stress enriched EST collections or microarray experiments.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S5.xls">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S6">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 6</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>The primers used for real time quantitative RT-PCR.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>The primers used for real time quantitative RT-PCR.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S6.xls">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
			<suppl id="S7">
				<title>
					<p>Additional data file 7</p>
				</title>
				<caption>
					<p>Microarray analysis of leaf samples taken from areas A, B, C and P in the Ein Avdat valley.</p>
				</caption>
				<text>
					<p>Microarray analysis of leaf samples taken from areas A, B, C and P in the Ein Avdat valley.</p>
				</text>
				<file name="gb-2005-6-12-r101-S7.DOC">
					<p>Click here for file</p>
				</file>
			</suppl>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
	<bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st>
				<p>We thank Dr Outi Monni at the Biomedicum Biochip Center, University of Helsinki, for printing the microarrays, Claude Brechet for running the carbon 13 isotope analyses, and Ms Tania Masci, Otto Warburg Center of Agricultural Biotechnology, for technical assistance with the GC-MS analysis. We are grateful to the Ein Avdat National Park, Israel Nature and National Park Authorities, Israel, for allowing us to harvest leaf material. This work was supported financially by the European Union under contract number QLK5-CT-2000-01377 (ESTABLISH), and by the Finnish Centre of Excellence Programme (2000-2005).</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p><it>Populus </it>: Arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree?</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Taylor</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ann Bot</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>90</volume>
				<fpage>681</fpage>
				<lpage>689</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/aob/mcf255</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12451023</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>Poplar genome sequence: functional genomics in an ecologically dominant plant species.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Brunner</snm>
						<fnm>AM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Busov</snm>
						<fnm>VB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Strauss</snm>
						<fnm>SH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Plant Sci</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>9</volume>
				<fpage>49</fpage>
				<lpage>56</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2003.11.006</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14729219</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of NaCl on shoot growth, transpiration, ion compartmentation, and transport in regenerated plants of <it>Populus euphratica </it>and <it>Populus tomentosa</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fritz</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>H&#252;ttermann</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Altman</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Can J For Res</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>33</volume>
				<fpage>967</fpage>
				<lpage>975</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1139/x03-066</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Vinocur</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Altman</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>218</volume>
				<fpage>1</fpage>
				<lpage>14</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14513379</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Vinocur</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Altman</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Curr Opin Biotechnol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>16</volume>
				<fpage>1</fpage>
				<lpage>10</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.001</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>Transcript identification and profiling during salt stress and recovery of <it>Populus euphratica</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Gu</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fonseca</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Puskas</snm>
						<fnm>LG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hackler</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
						<suf>Jr</suf>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zvara</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dudits</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pais</snm>
						<fnm>MS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Tree Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>24</volume>
				<fpage>265</fpage>
				<lpage>276</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14704136</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Living under a "dormant" canopy: a molecular acclimation mechanism of the desert plant <it>Retama raetam</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Mittler</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Merquiol</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hallak-Herr</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rachmilevitch</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaplan</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cohen</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant J</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>407</fpage>
				<lpage>416</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00975.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11260497</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>Molecular and biochemical mechanisms associated with dormancy and drought tolerance in the desert legume <it>Retama raetam</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Pnueli</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hallak-Herr</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rozenberg</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cohen</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Goloubinoff</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaplan</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mittler</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant J</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<fpage>319</fpage>
				<lpage>330</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01364.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12164811</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Growth and water relations of <it>Tamarix ramosissima </it>and <it>Populus euphratica </it>on Taklamakan desert dunes in relation to depth to a permanent water table.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Gries</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zeng</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Foetzki</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Arndt</snm>
						<fnm>SK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bruelheide</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Thomas</snm>
						<fnm>FM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Runge</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Cell Environ</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>26</volume>
				<fpage>725</fpage>
				<lpage>736</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01009.x</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does <it>Populus euphratica </it>Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species?</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hukin</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cochard</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dreyer</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Le Thiec</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bogeat-Triboulot</snm>
						<fnm>MB</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Exp Bot</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>56</volume>
				<fpage>2003</fpage>
				<lpage>2010</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jxb/eri198</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15967780</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>The Ein Avdat National Park</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.parks.org.il/ParksENG/company_card.php3?CNumber=421576</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Gene discovery in the wood-forming tissues of poplar: analysis of 5,692 expressed sequence tags.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterky</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Regan</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Karlsson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hertzberg</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rohde</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Holmberg</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Amini</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bhalerao</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Larsson</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Villarroel</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>95</volume>
				<fpage>13330</fpage>
				<lpage>13335</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">23802</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9789088</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.95.22.13330</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Gene expression in autumn leaves.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bhalerao</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keskitalo</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterky</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Erlandsson</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bj&#246;rkbacka</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Birve</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Karlsson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gardestr&#246;m</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gustafsson</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lundeberg</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>131</volume>
				<fpage>430</fpage>
				<lpage>442</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">166820</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12586868</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.012732</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>The poplar root transcriptome: analysis of 7000 expressed sequence tags.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kohler</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Delaruelle</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Martin</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Encelot</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Martin</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>FEBS Lett</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>542</volume>
				<fpage>37</fpage>
				<lpage>41</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00334-X</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12729894</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p>A transcriptional timetable of autumn senescence.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Andersson</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keskitalo</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sj&#246;din</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bhalerao</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterky</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wissel</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tandre</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Aspeborg</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Moyle</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ohmiya</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Biol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>5</volume>
				<fpage>R24</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">395783</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15059257</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-2004-5-4-r24</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>Expressed sequence tags from poplar wood tissues - a comparative analysis from multiple libraries.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>D&#233;jardin</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lepl&#233;</snm>
						<fnm>J-C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lesage-Descauses</snm>
						<fnm>M-C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Costa</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pilate</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Biol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>6</volume>
				<fpage>55</fpage>
				<lpage>64</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2003-44744</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15095135</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>Gene expression profiling of systemically wound-induced defenses in hybrid poplar.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Christopher</snm>
						<fnm>ME</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Miranda</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Major</snm>
						<fnm>IT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Constabel</snm>
						<fnm>CP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>219</volume>
				<fpage>936</fpage>
				<lpage>947</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00425-004-1297-3</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15605173</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>Suppression subtractive hybridization-mediated transcriptome analysis from multiple tissues of aspen (<it>Populus tremuloides</it>) altered in phenylpropanoid metabolism.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ranjan</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kao</snm>
						<fnm>Y-Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jiang</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Joshi</snm>
						<fnm>CP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Harding</snm>
						<fnm>SA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tsai</snm>
						<fnm>C-J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>219</volume>
				<fpage>694</fpage>
				<lpage>704</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s00425-004-1291-9</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15146331</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>A Populus EST resource for plant functional genomics.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sterky</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bhalerao</snm>
						<fnm>RR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Unneberg</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Segerman</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nilsson</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brunner</snm>
						<fnm>AM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Charbonnel-Campaa</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lindvall</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tandre</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Strauss</snm>
						<fnm>SH</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>101</volume>
				<fpage>13951</fpage>
				<lpage>13956</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">518859</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15353603</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.0401641101</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p>openSputnik - a database to ESTablish comparative plant genomics using unsaturated sequence collections.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rudd</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>33</volume>
				<fpage>D622</fpage>
				<lpage>D627</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">539994</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15608275</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gki040</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Apweiler</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bairoch</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wu</snm>
						<fnm>CH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Barker</snm>
						<fnm>WC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Boeckmann</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ferro</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gasteiger</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Huang</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lopez</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Magrane</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>32</volume>
				<fpage>D115</fpage>
				<lpage>D119</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">308865</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14681372</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/gkh131</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<cnm>The Gene Ontology Consortium</cnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nat Genet</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>25</fpage>
				<lpage>29</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1038/75556</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10802651</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>openSputnik Comparative Genomics Platform, The <it>Populus </it>Euphratica EST Project</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://sputnik.btk.fi/project?name=populus_euphratica</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>International <it>Populus </it>Genome Consortium</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.ornl.gov/sci/ipgc/home.htm</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>The response of the poplar transcriptome to wounding and subsequent infection by a viral pathogen.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Smith</snm>
						<fnm>CM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rodriguez-Buey</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Karlsson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Campbell</snm>
						<fnm>MM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>New Phytol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>164</volume>
				<fpage>123</fpage>
				<lpage>136</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01151.x</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<title>
					<p>Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Seki</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Narusaka</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ishida</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nanjo</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fujita</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Oono</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kamiya</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nakajima</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Enju</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sakurai</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant J</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<fpage>279</fpage>
				<lpage>292</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01359.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12164808</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Taji</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Seki</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Satou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sakurai</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kobayashi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ishiyama</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Narusaka</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Narusaka</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhu</snm>
						<fnm>JK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shinozaki</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>135</volume>
				<fpage>1697</fpage>
				<lpage>1709</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">519083</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15247402</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.104.039909</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Gene Ontology GOSlims</p>
				</title>
				<url>ftp://ftp.geneontology.org/pub/go/GO_slims</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Making sense of EST sequences by CLOBBing them.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Parkinson</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Guiliano</snm>
						<fnm>DB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Blaxter</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>BMC Bioinformatics</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>3</volume>
				<fpage>31</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">137596</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12398795</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-3-31</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of environment on relations between extension and cambial growth of <it>Populus euphratica </it>Oliv.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Liphschitz</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Waisel</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>New Phytol</source>
				<pubdate>1970</pubdate>
				<volume>69</volume>
				<fpage>1059</fpage>
				<lpage>1064</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Farquhar</snm>
						<fnm>GD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ehleringer</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hubick</snm>
						<fnm>KT</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol</source>
				<pubdate>1989</pubdate>
				<volume>40</volume>
				<fpage>503</fpage>
				<lpage>537</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p>An expression analysis of a gene family encoding plasma membrane aquaporins in response to abiotic stresses in <it>Arabidopsis thaliana</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Jang</snm>
						<fnm>JY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kim</snm>
						<fnm>DG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kim</snm>
						<fnm>YO</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kim</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kang</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Mol Biol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>54</volume>
				<fpage>713</fpage>
				<lpage>725</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/B:PLAN.0000040900.61345.a6</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15356390</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B33">
				<title>
					<p>Overexpression of a plasma membrane aquaporin in transgenic tobacco improves plant vigor under favorable growth conditions but not under drought or salt Stress.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Aharon</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shahak</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wininger</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bendov</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kapulnik</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Galili</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Cell</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>15</volume>
				<fpage>439</fpage>
				<lpage>447</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">141212</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12566583</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1105/tpc.009225</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B34">
				<title>
					<p>Real-time RT-PCR profiling of over 1400 Arabidopsis transcription factors: unprecedented sensitivity reveals novel root- and shoot-specific genes.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Czechowski</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bari</snm>
						<fnm>RP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Stitt</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Scheible</snm>
						<fnm>WR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Udvardi</snm>
						<fnm>MK</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant J</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>38</volume>
				<fpage>366</fpage>
				<lpage>379</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02051.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15078338</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B35">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in <it>Populus euphratica in vitro</it>.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Watanabe</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kojima</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ide</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sasaki</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Cell Tiss Org</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>63</volume>
				<fpage>199</fpage>
				<lpage>206</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1010619503680</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B36">
				<title>
					<p>Fructans, but not the sucrosyl-galactosides, raffinose and loliose, are affected by drought stress in perennial ryegrass.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Amiard</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Morvan-Bertrand</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Billard</snm>
						<fnm>JP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Huault</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Keller</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Prud'homme</snm>
						<fnm>MP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>132</volume>
				<fpage>2218</fpage>
				<lpage>2229</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">181305</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12913176</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.103.022335</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B37">
				<title>
					<p>Na<sup>+ </sup>tolerance and Na<sup>+ </sup>transport in higher plants.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tester</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Davenport</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ann Bot</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>91</volume>
				<fpage>503</fpage>
				<lpage>527</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/aob/mcg058</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12646496</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B38">
				<title>
					<p><it>Populus euphratica </it>displays apoplastic sodium accumulation, osmotic adjustment by decreases in calcium and soluble carbohydrates, and develops leaf succulence under salt stress.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ottow</snm>
						<fnm>EA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brinker</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Teichmann</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fritz</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaiser</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brosch&#233;</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kangasj&#228;rvi</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jiang</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Polle</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<inpress/>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16299175</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B39">
				<title>
					<p>The genetical structure of <it>Populus euphratica </it>and <it>Alhagi sparsifolia </it>stands in the Taklimakan desert.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Bruelheide</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Manegold</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jandt</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ecophysiology and Habitat Requirements of Perennial Plant Species in the Taklimakan Desert</source>
				<publisher>Aachen: Shaker</publisher>
				<editor>Runge M, Zhang X</editor>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<fpage>153</fpage>
				<lpage>160</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B40">
				<title>
					<p>Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kreps</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wu</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chang</snm>
						<fnm>HS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhu</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Harper</snm>
						<fnm>JF</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>130</volume>
				<fpage>2129</fpage>
				<lpage>2141</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">166725</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12481097</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.008532</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B41">
				<title>
					<p>From the waters of Babylon? <it>Populus euphratica </it>in Spain is clonal and probably introduced.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Fay</snm>
						<fnm>MF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liedo</snm>
						<fnm>MD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kornblum</snm>
						<fnm>MM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Crespo</snm>
						<fnm>MB</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biodivers Conserv</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>8</volume>
				<fpage>769</fpage>
				<lpage>778</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1023/A:1008842230383</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B42">
				<title>
					<p>When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Rizhsky</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liang</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shuman</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shulaev</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Davletova</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mittler</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>134</volume>
				<fpage>1683</fpage>
				<lpage>1696</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">419842</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15047901</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.103.033431</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B43">
				<title>
					<p>Overexpression of a stress-inducible aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in transgenic plants improves stress tolerance.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sunkar</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bartels</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kirch</snm>
						<fnm>HH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant J</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>35</volume>
				<fpage>452</fpage>
				<lpage>464</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01819.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12904208</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B44">
				<title>
					<p>Cloning and expression of multiple metallothioneins from hybrid poplar.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kohler</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Blaudez</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chalot</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Martin</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>New Phytol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>164</volume>
				<fpage>83</fpage>
				<lpage>93</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01168.x</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B45">
				<title>
					<p>Down-regulation of metallothionein, a reactive oxygen scavenger, by the small GTPase OsRac1 in rice.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wong</snm>
						<fnm>HL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sakamoto</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kawasaki</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Umemura</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shimamoto</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>135</volume>
				<fpage>1447</fpage>
				<lpage>1456</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">519061</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15220467</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.103.036384</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B46">
				<title>
					<p>Potent hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity of drought-induced type-2 metallothionein in wild watermelon.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Akashi</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Nishimura</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ishida</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yokota</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biochem Biophys Res Comm</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>323</volume>
				<fpage>72</fpage>
				<lpage>78</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.056</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15351703</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B47">
				<title>
					<p>Structure and expression of two genes that encode distinct drought-inducible cysteine proteinases in Arabidopsis thaliana.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Koizumi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yamaguchi-Shinozaki</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tsuji</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shinozaki</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Gene</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>129</volume>
				<fpage>175</fpage>
				<lpage>182</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0378-1119(93)90266-6</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">8325504</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B48">
				<title>
					<p>Salt cress. A halophyte and cryophyte Arabidopsis relative model system and its applicability to molecular genetic analyses of growth and development of extremophiles.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Inan</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>Q</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>Z</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cao</snm>
						<fnm>Z</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Quist</snm>
						<fnm>TM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Goodwin</snm>
						<fnm>SM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhu</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>135</volume>
				<fpage>1718</fpage>
				<lpage>1737</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">519085</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15247369</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.104.041723</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B49">
				<title>
					<p>Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and Arabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Taji</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Seki</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Satou</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sakurai</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kobayashi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ishiyama</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Narusaka</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Narusaka</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhu</snm>
						<fnm>JK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shinozaki</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>135</volume>
				<fpage>1697</fpage>
				<lpage>1709</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">519083</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15247402</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.104.039909</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B50">
				<title>
					<p>Exploring the temperature-stress metabolome of Arabidopsis.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Kaplan</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kopka</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Haskell</snm>
						<fnm>DW</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhao</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schiller</snm>
						<fnm>KC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gatzke</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sung</snm>
						<fnm>DY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Guy</snm>
						<fnm>CL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>136</volume>
				<fpage>4159</fpage>
				<lpage>4168</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.104.052142</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15557093</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">535846</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B51">
				<title>
					<p>Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae: a natural experiment in metabolic engineering of stress tolerance.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hanson</snm>
						<fnm>AD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rathinasabapathi</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rivoal</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Burnet</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dillon</snm>
						<fnm>MO</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gage</snm>
						<fnm>DA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Natl Acad Sci USA</source>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<volume>91</volume>
				<fpage>306</fpage>
				<lpage>310</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">42936</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">8278383</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B52">
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hewitt</snm>
						<fnm>EJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Smith</snm>
						<fnm>TA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Mineral Nutrition</source>
				<publisher>London: English Universities Press Ltd</publisher>
				<pubdate>1975</pubdate>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B53">
				<title>
					<p>Verbessertes Druckaufschlussystem f&#252;r biologische und anorganische Materialien.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Heinrichs</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Brumsack</snm>
						<fnm>HJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Loftfield</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>K&#246;nig</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd</source>
				<pubdate>1986</pubdate>
				<volume>149</volume>
				<fpage>350</fpage>
				<lpage>353</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B54">
				<title>
					<p>A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from Pine trees.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chang</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Puryear</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cairney</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Mol Biol Rep</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>11</volume>
				<fpage>113</fpage>
				<lpage>116</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B55">
				<title>
					<p>Construction of a normalized cDNA library by introduction of a semi-solid mRNA-cDNA hybridization system.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sasaki</snm>
						<fnm>YF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ayusawa</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Oishi</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>1994</pubdate>
				<volume>22</volume>
				<fpage>987</fpage>
				<lpage>992</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">307919</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">8152931</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B56">
				<title>
					<p>Suppression subtractive hybridization: a versatile method for identifying differentially expressed genes.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Diatchenko</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lukyanov</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lau</snm>
						<fnm>YF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Siebert</snm>
						<fnm>PD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Methods Enzymol</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>303</volume>
				<fpage>349</fpage>
				<lpage>380</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">10349654</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B57">
				<title>
					<p>CapSelect: A highly sensitive method for 5' CAP-dependent enrichment of full-length cDNA in PCR-mediated analysis of mRNAs.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schmidt</snm>
						<fnm>WM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mueller</snm>
						<fnm>MW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>e31</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">148683</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10518626</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/27.21.e31</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B58">
				<title>
					<p>Analysis of the floral transcriptome uncovers new regulators of organ determination and gene families related to flower organ differentiation in <it>Gerbera hybrida </it>(Asteraceae).</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Laitinen</snm>
						<fnm>RAE</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Immanen</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Auvinen</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Rudd</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Alatalo</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Paulin</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ainasoja</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kotilainen</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Koskela</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Teeri</snm>
						<fnm>TH</fnm>
					</au>
					<etal/>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>15</volume>
				<fpage>475</fpage>
				<lpage>486</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">1074362</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15781570</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1101/gr.3043705</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B59">
				<title>
					<p>ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Iseli</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jongeneel</snm>
						<fnm>CV</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bucher</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<fpage>138</fpage>
				<lpage>148</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">10786296</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B60">
				<title>
					<p>NASC The European Arabidopsis Stock Centre</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://arabidopsis.info/</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B61">
				<title>
					<p>European Bioinformatics Institute ArrayExpress database</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B62">
				<title>
					<p>Metabolic profiling of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing hexokinase reveals that the influence of hexose phosphorylation diminishes during fruit development.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Roessner-Tunali</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hegemann</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lytovchenko</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Carrari</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bruedigam</snm>
						<fnm>C</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Granot</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fernie</snm>
						<fnm>AR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant Physiol</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>133</volume>
				<fpage>84</fpage>
				<lpage>99</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">196583</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12970477</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1104/pp.103.023572</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B63">
				<title>
					<p>Metabolic profiling of leaves and fruit of wild species tomato: a survey of the Solanum lycopersicum complex.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schauer</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zamir</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fernie</snm>
						<fnm>AR</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Exp Bot</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>56</volume>
				<fpage>297</fpage>
				<lpage>307</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/jxb/eri057</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15596477</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B64">
				<title>
					<p>Transcriptome analysis of sulfur depletion in Arabidopsis thaliana: interlacing of biosynthetic pathways provides response specificity.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Nikiforova</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Freitag</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kempa</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Adamik</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hesse</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hoefgen</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Plant J</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>33</volume>
				<fpage>633</fpage>
				<lpage>650</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01657.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12609038</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B65">
				<title>
					<p>The significance of digital gene expression profiles.</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Audic</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Claverie</snm>
						<fnm>JM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome Res</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>7</volume>
				<fpage>986</fpage>
				<lpage>995</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9331369</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B66">
				<title>
					<p>The Structural and Genomic Information Laboratory</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.igs.cnrs-mrs.fr</url>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B67">
				<title>
					<p>PopulusDB</p>
				</title>
				<url>http://www.populus.db.umu.se/</url>
			</bibl>
		</refgrp>
	</bm>
</art>

